U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
RICKLEY v. County of Los Angeles
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Author
- Raymond C. Fisher
- Filed
- Oct. 4, 2011
- Case
- RICKLEY v. County of Los Angeles
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT REBECCA A. RICKLEY, No. 09-56498 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:08-cv-04918- COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; WILLIAM SVW-AGR HOWARD; KEVIN PETROWSKY; ORDER SOHEILA KALHOR; MICHAEL TRIPP; AMENDING RAJESH PATEL, Defendants-Appellees. OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 10, 2011—Pasadena, California Filed August 19, 2011 Amended October 4, 2011 18691 18692 RICKLEY v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Before: Michael Daly Hawkins and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges, and Mark L. Wolf, District Judge.* Opinion by Judge Fisher *The Honorable Mark L. Wolf, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation. 18694 RICKLEY v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES COUNSEL Natasha Roit (argued), Malibu, California; Christopher L. Campbell, Los Angeles, California, for the appellant. RICKLEY v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 18695 Andrea Sheridan Ordin, County Counsel, and Casey C. Yourn, Deputy County Counse…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.