Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Author
Cynthia Holcomb Hall
Filed
June 4, 2003
Case
Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company v. Granite State Insurance Company, Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company v. Granite State Insurance Company
Case status
Decided

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

330 F.3d 1214 EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU, a Mutual Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRANITE STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Granite State Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant. No. 01-57231. No. 02-55024. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted February 5, 2003. Filed June 4, 2003. Bryan M. Barber, Larson King, San Francisco, CA, for the appellant-cross-appellee. Mark G. Bonino and Marta B. Arriandiaga, Ropers, Majeski, Kohn Bentley, San Jose, CA, for the appellee-cross-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-92-00406-SVW. Before HALL, THOMPSON, and BERZON, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL; Dissent by Judge DAVID R. THOMPSON CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge. 1 The instant case is a subrogation action between a primary insurer, Employers Insurance of Wausau ("Wausau"), and an excess insurer, Granite State Insurance Company ("Granite"). The parties dispute whether Granite is liable to Wausau as a result of a settlement paid by Wausau…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)