Opinion of the Court — Katz v. Science Applications International Corp.

This writing

Type: Opinion of the Court
Filed: April 15, 2003
Case: Katz v. Science Applications International Corp.
Case status: Decided

Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 15th day of April, Two Thousand and Three. UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the decision of said district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. Debtor-appellant Commco Technology LLC, a/k/a Broadstream Communications Corp. (“Commco”) appeals the district court’s January 2, 2002 judgment affirming the February 2, 2001 judgment of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut (Alan H.W. Shift, Chief Judge) denying Commco’s motion for an injunction against Science Applications International Corp. (“SAIC”) and U.S. Bank. This case is a product of Commco’s claim that SAIC fraudulently attempted to draw, and later fraudulently drew on a l…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.