Peia v. United States Bankruptcy Court

Type

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

April 9, 2003

Case

Peia v. United States Bankruptcy Court

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 9th day of April, two thousand and three. ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Albert Peia, pro se, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Peter C. Dorsey, Judge), dismissing his claims brought pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq., and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FCTA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b), 2671 et seq., against the United States of America, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut, bankruptcy trustee Richard Coan, and fifteen John Doe defendants. We affirm. P…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.