U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Dean Hotop v. City of San Jose
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- Dec. 7, 2020
- Case
- Dean Hotop v. City of San Jose
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEAN HOTOP; KEN SCHNEEBELI; JEFF No. 18-16995 ZELL; SHERMAN ZELL; LOIS ZELL; LOUISE PETER; SEIGI TADOKORO; D.C. No. PAT CREMA; SEAN RHINEHART; 5:18-cv-02024- SHUCHUN HUANG; JAMES LHK CAMPAGNA; SAL RUIZ; ISAAC AGAM; STEVE MAHL; LLOYD KIP; ROBERTA MOORE; DENG LIU; SHASHA CHEN; OPINION SMALL PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION - SAN JOSE;…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Read the full document (court PDF)
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Concurrence | Mark Jeremy Bennett | Dec. 7, 2020 |