U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Landau v. Eisenberg
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- May 1, 2019
- Case
- Landau v. Eisenberg
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Per Curiam. In June 2005, two groups from the Bobov Hasidic Jewish community in Brooklyn, New York, agreed to arbitrate certain disputes before a rabbinical tribunal. Petitioners-appellees asserted that "Bobov" was "a trademark within the meaning of section 45 of the Lanham Act ... because for decades, the word 'Bobov' has been used in commerce to distinguish the goods and services of…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.