U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc.
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- July 10, 2019
- Case
- GN Netcom, Inc. v. Plantronics, Inc.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
SMITH, Chief Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with my colleagues that the District Court did not abuse its discretion by imposing a permissive adverse inference sanction, and I therefore join Section III.A of the majority opinion. I write separately to add two points to the majority's cogent analysis of why it was permissible for the Court to impose this sanction…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | July 10, 2019 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | July 10, 2019 |