U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Jennifer Sweda v. University of Pennsylvania
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- May 2, 2019
- Case
- Jennifer Sweda v. University of Pennsylvania
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
ROTH, Senior Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: Like many large employers, the University of Pennsylvania maintains a retirement plan for its employees. Between 2009 and 2014, the plan's assets increased in value by $ 1.6 billion, a 73% return on investment. Despite this increase, plaintiffs have filed a putative class action, claiming that the plan's fiduciaries have impr…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | May 2, 2019 |
| Opinion | Not attributed | May 2, 2019 |