Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Concurrence in part
Filed
Aug. 15, 2019
Case
United States v. Thomas Norman
Case status
Decided

Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

KING, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: Although I join my good colleagues in rejecting defendant Thomas Norman's Fourth Amendment contention and affirming the judgment, I do not agree that United States v. McCollum , 885 F.3d 300…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Other writings in this case

TypeAuthorFiled
Opinion of the Court Not attributed Aug. 15, 2019
Opinion Not attributed Aug. 15, 2019