Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Dissent
Filed
June 13, 2019
Case
United States v. James Hill, III
Case status
Decided

Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

AGEE, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Like the majority, I believe that the proper outcome in this case naturally flows from the Supreme Court's Commerce Clause precedent and the terms of 18 U.S.C. § 249 (a)(2)(B)(iv)(I). Unlike the majority, I conclude that Congress' power under the Commerce…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Other writings in this case

TypeAuthorFiled
Opinion of the Court Not attributed June 13, 2019
Opinion Not attributed June 13, 2019