U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. James Michael Farrell
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- April 5, 2019
- Case
- United States v. James Michael Farrell
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
THACKER, Circuit Judge, concurring: I join the well reasoned majority opinion. I write separately to highlight my view that our decision in this case should not be read so broadly to place defense attorneys in legal jeopardy for money laundering simply as a result of their representation of criminal defendants in the normal course. The record before us is replete with evidence that James Mi…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | April 5, 2019 |
| Opinion | Not attributed | April 5, 2019 |