U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Norfolk Southern Railway v. City of Roanoke
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- Feb. 15, 2019
- Case
- Norfolk Southern Railway v. City of Roanoke
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
WYNN, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the majority opinion's determination that the City of Roanoke's stormwater assessment constitutes a "fee," rather than a "tax," and therefore is not subject to the provision in the Railroad Revitalization and Reform Act (the "4-R Act") prohibiting state and municipal "tax[es]" that discriminate against rail carriers.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | Feb. 15, 2019 |
| Opinion | Not attributed | Feb. 15, 2019 |