U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Booking.com. B v. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- Feb. 4, 2019
- Case
- Booking.com. B v. v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
WYNN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: This case addresses a problem that Booking.com chose to bring upon itself. Because trademark law does not protect generic terms, an online business, like Booking.com, has two options in choosing its domain name. On the one hand, it can choose to operate under a generic domain 1 tha…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | Feb. 4, 2019 |
| Opinion | Not attributed | Feb. 4, 2019 |