Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion of the Court
Per curiam
Yes — no individual author
Filed
Jan. 3, 2003
Case
Housing Works, Inc. v. Giuliani
Case status
Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

SUMMARY ORDER UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED. The defendants appeal a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Marrero, J.) denying their motion to dismiss, on the grounds of qualified immunity, the plaintiffs’ claims of violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The motion to dismiss was brought pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We agree with the district court that the plaintiffs have pled sufficient facts to survive the defendants’ motion. The district court’s published opinion provides a complete account of the relevant background of this appeal. Housing Works v. Turner, 179 F.Supp.2d 177 (S.D.N.Y.2001). We therefore limit our discussion to the defendants’ two arguments on appeal: that they should have been accorded qualified immunity (1) against the plaintiffs’ claims for violations of the First Amendment and (2) against the plaintiffs’ claims for violations of the Equal Protection Clause. We review the district court’s denial of the defendants’ motion to dismiss on the pleadings de novo, accepting the allegati…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.