U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Local Holdings, Inc. v. Parsky
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Author
- Alan David Lourie
- Filed
- Aug. 2, 2002
- Case
- Southern California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, Local Holdings, Inc. v. Parsky
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
*494 ON MOTION LOURIE, Circuit Judge. ORDER The United States moves to dismiss Gerald L. Parsky’s appeal as premature. Parsky responds. The United States replies. Parsky filed a complaint in the Court of Federal Claims asserting Wmstar-related claims regarding, inter aha, Southern California Federal Savings and Loan Association (SoCal). The claims regarding SoCal were consolidated with other plaintiffs claims regarding SoCal, and Parsky’s claims regarding other institutions were consolidated with other plaintiffs’ claims regarding those institutions. On December 12, 2001, the Court of Federal Claims issued an order determining that his claims against SoCal were untimely. On December 14, 2001, the Court of Federal Claims directed the clerk to enter judgment, apparently to dismiss Parsky’s claims against SoCal. * The United States argues that, absent a certification pursuant to RCFC 54(b), Par-sky’s appeal is premature because the other plaintiffs’ claims remain to be adjudicated. We agree. In Spraytex, Inc. v. DJS T, 96 F.3d 1377,1382 (Fed.Cir.1996), we held that a Rule 54(b) certification, stating that there is no just reason for delay and directing entry of judgment, is required t…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.