Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Author
Alan David Lourie
Filed
July 15, 2002
Case
Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Incorporated
Case status
Decided

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

323 F.3d 956 ENZO BIOCHEM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEN-PROBE INCORPORATED, and Chugai Pharma U.S.A., Inc. and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Biomerieux, Inc., and Becton Dickinson and Company, Defendants-Appellees, and Biomerieux SA, Defendant. No. 01-1230. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. DECIDED: July 15, 2002. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Richard L. Delucia, Kenyon Kenyon, of New York, NY, filed a petition for rehearing en banc for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the petition were Charles A. Weiss and Bradley S. Corsello. The appellees filed a consolidated response to the petition for rehearing en banc. William F. Lee, Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, MA, for defendant-appellee Gen-Probe Incorporated. With him on the response was William G. McElwain. Robert J. Gunther, Jr., Latham Watkins, of New York, NY, for defendants-appellees Chugai Pharma U.S.A., Inc. and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. With him on the response was Jeffrey A. Tochner. Of counsel was Kurt M. Rogers. Daniel A. Boehnen, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert Berghoff, of Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee Biomerieux, Inc. With him on the response was Joshua R. Rich. Dona…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)