U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Riley v. Beverage Air
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 28, 2002
- Case
- Riley v. Beverage Air
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
PER CURIAM. Kathy Riley appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment and dismissing her state privacy act and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) claims. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601-2654 (West 1999). We have reviewed the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Riley v. Beverage Air, No. CA-00-2267-8-24 (D.S.C. Nov. 28, 2001). *991 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.