U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Hawkins v. Johns Hopkins Club
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 25, 2002
- Case
- Hawkins v. Johns Hopkins Club
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
PER CURIAM. Gerald Hawkins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his employment discrimination action on summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hawkins v. Johns Hopkins Club, No. CA-01-737-L (D.Md. Feb. 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.