U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Free Methodist Foundation v. Prosoft I-net Solutions, Inc.
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 20, 2002
- Case
- Free Methodist Foundation v. Prosoft I-net Solutions, Inc.
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
PER CURIAM. Plaintiffs appeal the District Court’s Opinion and Order dated September 19, 2000 Granting Defendant Prosoft I-Net Solutions’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the District Court’s Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration dated October 11, 2000. Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, we are not persuaded that the District Court erred. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.