U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Delgado
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Filed
- June 19, 2002
- Case
- United States v. Delgado
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
MEMORANDUM ** Andres Delgado appeals his 12-month sentence following his guilty plea to one count of importing marijuana. His argument challenging the constitutionality of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 is foreclosed by United States v. Varela-Rivera, 279 F.3d 1174 , 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) and United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir.2002). This court has recently reject *480 ed his claim that the government was required to prove that he knew the quantity and type of the drugs involved in the offense. United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.