U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States ex rel. Rakow v. Pro Builders Corp.
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Filed
- June 19, 2002
- Case
- United States ex rel. Rakow v. Pro Builders Corp.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
MEMORANDUM * Relator Lee Rakow (“Rakow”) alleged that Pro Builders Corporation (“Pro Builders”) violated the False Claims Act (“FCA”) by falsely certifying compliance with its building contract and federal labor law in order to receive payment from the federal government. The district court *931 granted summary judgment in favor of Pro Builders because (1) Pro Builders’s certification of compliance was not a prerequisite to payment; and (2) Rakow adduced no evidence that Pro Builders knowingly submitted false certifications. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm the district court’s decision on the latter ground. The FCA imposes liability only on those who “knowingly” present a false claim to the government. 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (a)(1). For purposes of the FCA, “knowingly” means: (1) actual knowledge of the information; (2) deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or (3) reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (b). This broad definition of “knowingly” requires “simple inquiries which would alert” a prudent individual “that false claims are being submitted.” See Sen. Rep. No. 99-345 reprinted in 1986 U…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Concurrence | M. Margaret McKeown | June 19, 2002 |