U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Trinidad-Castro
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Filed
- June 19, 2002
- Case
- United States v. Trinidad-Castro
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Trinidad-Castro appeals his conviction by guilty plea to one count of importation of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Trinidad-Castro’s contention that the indictment should be dismissed because Sections 952 and 960 are unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by United States v. Mendoza-Paz, 286 F.3d 1104, 1109-1111 (9th Cir.2002) (Section 960), and United States v. Varela-Rivera, 279 F.3d 1174 , 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002) (Section 952). His contention that the indictment should be dismissed because it did not allege mens rea as to drug type and quantity is foreclosed by United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634 , -, - - -, slip op. 6531, 6546-47 (9th Cir.2002). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.