Opinion of the Court — United States v. Landfair

This writing

Type: Opinion of the Court
Filed: June 19, 2002
Case: United States v. Landfair
Case status: Decided

Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

MEMORANDUM ** Melvin Landfair appeals his judgment of conviction and 147-month sentence after his guilty plea to conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and armed bank robbery *478 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) with use of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (e). His attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issue for appeal. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to withdraw as counsel of record for appellant and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.