U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Kerr v. Hickenlooper
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- July 22, 2019
- Case
- Kerr v. Hickenlooper
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
HOLMES, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. Unlike the majority, I would affirm the district court's judgment based on the political-subdivision standing doctrine. For the political-subdivision plaintiffs ("Plaintiffs") to have standing, our decision in City of Hugo v. Nichols ,…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | July 22, 2019 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | July 22, 2019 |