U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Evans v. Sandy City
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- July 5, 2019
- Case
- Evans v. Sandy City
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. In my view, Sandy City has not carried its burden to establish that the Ordinance is narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest. Nor has Sandy City established that the affected medians are nonpublic fora. I would reverse the district court's grant of summary judgment to the City and remand for further proceedings. I As…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | July 5, 2019 |
| Opinion | Not attributed | July 5, 2019 |