U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Kell v. Benzon
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- May 28, 2019
- Case
- Kell v. Benzon
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Today, this Court holds we do not have appellate jurisdiction over grants of Rhines stays in capital cases. In so holding, the Court fails to see the forest for the trees. Despite the Supreme Court's repeated admonitions that we should give 28 U.S.C. § 1291 a "pract…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | May 28, 2019 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | May 28, 2019 |