U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
United States v. Aragon
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- April 29, 2019
- Case
- United States v. Aragon
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
HOLMES, J., concurring. I join in full the principal opinion but write separately to underscore the legal and ethical impropriety of the form of plea bargaining that the district court perceived (correctly or not) to be at work in this case. As I understand the principal opinion, it resolves the case in part by assuming that the district court clearly erred in finding that the parties-in order to arrive at what…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | April 29, 2019 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | April 29, 2019 |