U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Estate of Jaime Ceballos v. Husk
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- March 26, 2019
- Case
- Estate of Jaime Ceballos v. Husk
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
BACHARACH, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. Officer William Husk responded to a 911 report that Mr. Jaime Ceballos was armed and creating a disturbance in a residential neighborhood. Officer Husk's response led to a confrontation in which he fatally shot Mr. Ceballos. Mr. Ceballos's estate and family sued, bringing four claims: 1. a claim against Officer H…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | March 26, 2019 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | March 26, 2019 |