Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Concurrence in part
Filed
Feb. 26, 2019
Case
United States v. Orozco
Case status
Decided

Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

LUCERO, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. My esteemed colleagues and I are constant in our view that the district court neither erred in finding a violation of Orozco's Sixth Amendment right to present a defense, nor abused its discretion in vacating his conviction and granting his motion for a new trial. Further, we agree that the district court failed to conduct the proper balancing…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Other writings in this case

TypeAuthorFiled
Opinion Not attributed Feb. 26, 2019
Opinion of the Court Not attributed Feb. 26, 2019