U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
SEC. & Exch. Comm'n v. Scoville
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- Jan. 24, 2019
- Case
- SEC. & Exch. Comm'n v. Scoville
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
BRISCOE, J., concurring. I concur in the judgment. I agree with the majority that AdPacks are "securities" within the meaning of the 1933 and 1934 securities acts, Maj. Op. 1219-22, that Scoville did not adequately preserve the personal liability issue, id. at 1225 n.11, and that the SEC is likely…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | Jan. 24, 2019 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | Jan. 24, 2019 |