U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. Paul Johnson, Jr.
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- April 16, 2019
- Case
- United States v. Paul Johnson, Jr.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Today we hold that any ammunition may always be seized during a frisk when the searching officer immediately identifies it as ammunition, regardless of any surrounding circumstances. This is a new rule that we did not ask the parties to address, that neither party briefed, and that the government expressly declined to adopt at oral argument. Indeed, during ora…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | April 16, 2019 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | April 16, 2019 |
| Concurrence | Not attributed | April 16, 2019 |