U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Davis v. Dist. of Columbia
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- June 7, 2019
- Case
- Davis v. Dist. of Columbia
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Katsas, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: This case arises out of a reduction in force (RIF) conducted by the District of Columbia Child and Family Services Agency. The plaintiffs challenged the RIF as the source of an alleged disparate impact on black employees. On summary judgment, the district court held that the RIF itself-a series of layoffs-was not a particular employm…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 7, 2019 |
| Opinion | Not attributed | June 7, 2019 |