Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion of the Court
Per curiam
Yes — no individual author
Filed
April 22, 2019
Case
United States v. Clark
Case status
Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on defendant Floyd Clark's motion [Dkt. No. 114] to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as amended by the supplement to defendant's motion [Dkt. No. 132]. The United States opposes the motion. Upon careful…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.