U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
United States v. Clark
This writing
- Type
- Opinion of the Court
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- April 22, 2019
- Case
- United States v. Clark
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on defendant Floyd Clark's motion [Dkt. No. 114] to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as amended by the supplement to defendant's motion [Dkt. No. 132]. The United States opposes the motion. Upon careful…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.