Supreme Court of the United States
Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- Dec. 8, 2009
- Case
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Carpenter
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Thomas, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I concur in the judgment and in Part II-C of the Court’s opinion because I wholeheartedly agree that “Congress’s designation of the rulemaking process as the way to define or refine when a district court ruling is ‘final’ and when an interlocutory order is appealable warrants the Judiciary’s *115</…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | Dec. 8, 2009 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | Dec. 8, 2009 |