Supreme Court of the United States
District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- June 18, 2009
- Case
- District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Souter, dissenting. I respectfully dissent on the ground that Alaska has failed to provide the effective procedure required by the Fourteenth Amendment for vindicating the liberty interest in demonstrating innocence that the state law recognizes. I therefore join Part I of Justice Stevens’s dissenting opinion. I would not decide Osborne’s…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 18, 2009 |
| Opinion | Not attributed | June 18, 2009 |
| Concurrence | Not attributed | June 18, 2009 |