Supreme Court of the United States
Yeager v. United States
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- June 18, 2009
- Case
- Yeager v. United States
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Kennedy, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I join Parts I — III and V of the Court’s opinion but cannot join Part IV. In my view the concerns expressed by Justice Alito are well justified. Post, p. 133 (dissenting opinion). It is insufficient for the Court to say that, on remand, the Court of Appeals “may,” “[i]f it chooses,” “…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 18, 2009 |
| Opinion | Not attributed | June 18, 2009 |
| Dissent | Not attributed | June 18, 2009 |