Supreme Court of the United States
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- May 4, 2009
- Case
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Ginsburg, dissenting. Although the question is close, I would uphold the determinations of the courts below that Shell qualifies as an arranger within the compass of the Comprehensive Envi*621ronmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA). See 42 U.S.C. §9607(a)(3). As the facts found by the District Court bear out, App. to Pet. for C…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | May 4, 2009 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | May 4, 2009 |