Supreme Court of the United States
Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- April 1, 2009
- Case
- Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
*230Justice Breyer, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I agree with the Court that the relevant statutory language authorizes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) to compare costs and benefits. Ante, at 217-223. Nonetheless the drafting history and legislative history of related provisions, Pub. L.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | April 1, 2009 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | April 1, 2009 |