Supreme Court of the United States
Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc.
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- Feb. 25, 2009
- Case
- Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Stevens, Justice Souter, and Justice Ginsburg join, concurring in the judgment. I would accept respondents’ concession that the Ninth Circuit majority’s “price squeeze” holding is wrong, I would vacate the Circuit’s decision, and I would remand the case in order to allow the District Court to determine whether respondents may proceed with their “predatory pricing” claim…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | Feb. 25, 2009 |
| Opinion | John G. Roberts Jr. | Feb. 25, 2009 |