Supreme Court of the United States
Carcieri v. Salazar
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- Feb. 24, 2009
- Case
- Carcieri v. Salazar
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Stevens, dissenting. Congress has used the term “Indian” in the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 to describe those individuals who are entitled to special protections and benefits under federal Indian law. The Act specifies that benefits shall be available to individuals who qualify as Indian either as a result of *402blood quantum or as descenda…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | Feb. 24, 2009 |
| Opinion | Not attributed | Feb. 24, 2009 |
| Concurrence | Not attributed | Feb. 24, 2009 |
| Concurrence in part | Not attributed | Feb. 24, 2009 |