Supreme Court of the United States
Oregon v. Ice
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- Jan. 14, 2009
- Case
- Oregon v. Ice
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
*173Justice Scalia, with whom The Chief Justice, Justice Souter, and Justice Thomas join, dissenting. The rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U. S. 466 (2000), is clear: Any fact — other than that of a prior conviction— that increases the maximum punishment to which a defendant may be sentenced must be admitted by the defendant or proved…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Jan. 14, 2009 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | Jan. 14, 2009 |