Supreme Court of the United States
Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- June 19, 2008
- Case
- Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Thomas, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I write separately to note that I continue to believe that disparate-impact claims are not cognizable under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U. S. C. § 621 et seq. See Smith v. City of Jackson, 544 U. S. 228, 247-268 (2005) (O’…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | David Hackett Souter | June 19, 2008 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 19, 2008 |
| Concurrence | Not attributed | June 19, 2008 |