Supreme Court of the United States
Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- June 16, 2008
- Case
- Florida Department of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Breyer, with whom Justice Stevens joins, dissenting. The Bankruptcy Code provides that the “transfer” of an asset “under a plan confirmed under section 1129 of this title, may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or similar tax.” 11 U. S. C. § 1146(a) (2000 ed., Supp. V) (previously § 1146(c)) (emphasis added). In this case, the debtor’s re…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Clarence Thomas | June 16, 2008 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 16, 2008 |