Supreme Court of the United States
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Billing
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- June 18, 2007
- Case
- Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Billing
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Thomas, dissenting. The Court believes it must decide whether the securities laws implicitly preclude application of the antitrust laws because the securities statutes “are silent in respect to antitrust.” See ante, at 271. I disagree with that basic premise. The securities statutes are not silent. Both the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act contain broad saving clauses that preserve…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | June 18, 2007 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 18, 2007 |
| Concurrence | Not attributed | June 18, 2007 |