Supreme Court of the United States
Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- April 2, 2007
- Case
- Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Thomas, concurring in part. I join all but Part III-A of the Court’s opinion. I write separately to note my disagreement with the dicta in that portion of the opinion, which states that the statutory cross-reference does not mandate a singular regulatory construction. The Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) statute explicitly links the definition of the term “modification…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | April 2, 2007 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | April 2, 2007 |