Supreme Court of the United States
Carey v. Musladin
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- Dec. 11, 2006
- Case
- Carey v. Musladin
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Souter, concurring in the judgment. In this habeas proceeding, a federal court may not set aside the state judgment sustaining Musladin’s conviction without finding it contrary to, or an unreasonable application *82of, clearly established federal law. 28 U. S. C. § 2254(d)(1). While the ground between criteria entailed by “clearly established”…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Clarence Thomas | Dec. 11, 2006 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | Dec. 11, 2006 |