Supreme Court of the United States
Purcell v. Gonzalez
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- Oct. 20, 2006
- Case
- Purcell v. Gonzalez
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Stevens, concurring. Allowing the election to proceed without enjoining the statutory provisions at issue will provide the courts with a better record on which to judge their constitutionality. At least two important factual issues remain largely unresolved: the scope of the disenfranchisement that the novel identification requirements will produce, and the prevalence and character of the fraudulent…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Per curiam | Oct. 20, 2006 |
| Opinion of the Court | Per curiam | Oct. 20, 2006 |