Supreme Court of the United States
Clark v. Arizona
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- June 29, 2006
- Case
- Clark v. Arizona
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Breyer, concurring in part and dissenting in part. As I understand the Court’s opinion, it distinguishes among three categories of evidence related to insanity: (1) fact-related evidence as to the defendant’s specific state of mind at the time of the crime, e. g., evidence that shows he…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Not attributed | June 29, 2006 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 29, 2006 |