Supreme Court of the United States
Washington v. Recuenco
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- June 26, 2006
- Case
- Washington v. Recuenco
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
*223Justice Stevens, dissenting. Like Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U. S. 398 (2006), and Kansas v. Marsh, ante, p. 163, this is a case in which the Court has granted review in order to make sure that a State’s highest court has not granted its citizens any greater protectio…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 26, 2006 |
| Opinion | Clarence Thomas | June 26, 2006 |
| Concurrence | Not attributed | June 26, 2006 |