Supreme Court of the United States
Davis v. Washington
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- June 19, 2006
- Case
- Davis v. Washington
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice Thomas, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. In Crawford v. Washington, 541 U. S. 36 (2004), we abandoned the general reliability inquiry we had long employed to judge the admissibility of hearsay evidence under the Confrontation Clause, describing that inquiry as “inherently, and therefore permanently, unpredict…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Antonin Scalia | June 19, 2006 |
| Opinion of the Court | Not attributed | June 19, 2006 |